I believe that the questions he’s been asked are unfair. He’s not been read into the program — he has been asked to give opinions of a program or techniques of a program on which he’s not been briefed. I will make the case — and I strongly believe this is true — that Judge Mukasey is not being treated fairly.HUH? The guy is up for approval as Attorney-General and he hasn't had a full security check? Is that what we're to believe? Or he has had a security check and hasn't passed? Or he has passed, but they are keeping the vital torture memos from him--even after the questions that the Senate has asked? Can you believe that? Can ANY well-meaning person believe that?
Or is it just another one of Bush's lies?
2 comments:
It seems that if the nominee opposes waterboarding and gets confirmed he would have to indict his sponsors for breaking the law.
If the law makes waterboarding illegal--as it clearly does--he should indict his sponsors whether he opposes the practice or not. But if he does not oppose the practice he does not deserve the post.
Post a Comment