Consider this: Brown asked to be sworn in to the Senate early so that he could vote against an Obama nominee to the National Labor Relations Board. Brown opposes the Disclose Act, which would (weakly) force "social welfare organizations" to reveal some of their biggest donors. Brown voted against extending the Bush tax cuts for incomes up to $250,000. (That measure is often wrongly characterized as a tax increase for those earning more than that very high figure, but they would save on the first cool quarter of a million dollars; it's just that they would save even more if the tax cuts are extended for the very, very rich.) Brown opposes re-enacting the assault-weapons ban.
Yes, I know. Brown has broken with his party on a few occasions. The Republican leadership lets him off the reservation just enough to allow some credulous observers to call him a "moderate."
So, what's going on here? Is Flynn's endorsement a matter of principle, or does just Ray want one more pathetic turn in the limelight?
Memo to Ray Flynn: Sit down and be quiet.